Xerox 's downfall
VOLKSWAGEN Emissions Cheating Scandal
DISSOLUTION OF Doc Talk
satyam computers corporate failure
FAILURE OF TATA NANO
TOYOTA'S RECALL CRISIS
The downfall of KODAK
FAILURE OF BLACKBERRY
Blackberry was founded in 1984. Blackberry is a communication device that was developed in the year 1999 by Research in Motion (RIM) company. Their security features, iconic QWERTY keyboards and email systems made blackberry phones a popular choice back in time. Blackberry phones were the king of smartphones. They made history by selling more than 5 crore units in a single year. They controlled 43% of the smartphone market in the US and 20% of the global market.
RIM company was developed a wireless radio modem with the available technology. Thereafter, RIM company collaborated with other companies in software development and wireless email system. They did a commendable job in all of these. RIM, thus evolved into a high profit company. In 1999, they changed their name from RIM to Blackberry. By 2000, they were able to generate mobile phones independently. The model released was Blackberry 957.
They were able to bring updates quickly and this gained the popularity and liking of consumers especially the businessmen. Blackberry phones brought rapid changes in their features. They introduced color display, camera and QWERTY keyboard. It aided in sending quick emails. But in 2007, Steve Jobs conducted an Apple event and he mocked that blackberry phones as baby software and he also criticized indirectly. Then the I-phone launches and their update features, initially all these didn't affected the market of blackberry. Because people were reluctant to shift complete touch phone with no button and also I-phone was expensive.
With the introduction of Android phones in 2008, everything turned upside down. The competition was boosted up. By 2010, the market of blackberry began to get affected. It was nowhere near to the marketing strategies of Apple. Their market share fell by 5% in 2012 might be because of their ego, blackberry was reluctant to change their QWERTY keyboard. But when the company began to witness down fall in 2012, they were ready to launch touch phones. But they released their first touchphone only in 2013. They were very late in bringing such changes. By the time they brought this change, the consumers world was changed into Android or I-phones.
In 2016, they decided to stop making it's own phones, after year of failures. The name blackberry itself started to disappear. People don't need their touchphone anymore. In January 2022, company announced that they will not be providing new updates in the software and old phones also will not be having new updates in the software. The production of the smartphone were stopped even before that. So it is clear that company is almost dead. The company is still alive but they are wiped out from the smartphone area. They still run their company through other businesses.
In conclusion, it's competitive advantage lies in it's focus on security, it's expertise in mobile technology and software development. The introduction of the Apple I-phone, which blackberry didn't take seriously caused a loss of market share and also excessive focus on enterprise over consumer taste and preference. The main reasons are : They ignored the trend, lack of innovation, incapability to judge, lack of consumer insight and poor design.
AISWARYA K
Corporate Failure : PepperTap
Fading Wings: PAN AM's Quiet Descent

Imagine being the founding member of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), enjoying a near monopoly on international routes, the unofficial national carrier of the United States; that was Pan Am. Pan American World Airways founded in 1927 by two U.S Army Majors was the most famous principal and largest international air carrier. They were the unofficial overseas flag carrier of the United States for the most part of the 20th century. Once their slogan was "Live today, Tomorrow will cost more!". They were at the top of their field as the sky is not their limit. But now a few people know the name Pan Am. Now it's just one of the defunct companies that are being diminished from the minds of the public. Only bits and pieces of this "Conglomerate" exists today. The descent is due to a lot of internal and external factors, the Industry.
1. Financial Troubles

All companies experience tightness in their financials. But in this case, they expanded their fleet at a rate no one would imagine. And that made their pockets a little slim. The problem was time they expanded. Many other airlines came in for their own pound of customers and they were ready to sacrifice a little bit of profit for gaining (in this scenario stealing from Pan Am)customers. The expansion of fleets and routes set back a fortune and that put them in a tight spot making them not able to reduce the price. That only strained their financial resources.
2. Rising Debt
They did accomplish a great expansion in fleet and route, but the question is at what cost? They alone couldn't handle such a large change. So they took some financial help from the available sources. Actually can't blame them, if the other emerging airlines haven't been so generous Pan Am could pull through out of that debt. This large debt took their ability to be financially stable like before.
3. Oil Price Shocks

The infamous Oil Crisis in 1970 was a significant turning point in global energy dynamics, influencing policies, economies, and geopolitics for years to come. This shook Pan Am badly because their planes were craving the costly jet fuel. Blaming OAPEC (Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries) and their response to the political development in the Middle East was making no good. The overly-priced jet fuel made their financials thinner.
4. Terrorist Attacks

There was a terrorist bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 when it was over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988. Already their financials were a mess and their goodwill was getting out of hand. And now this, being able to be like old times was just a normal daydream. For Pan Am the old saying is true; "When it Rains, it Pours". They wanted to fly but they were in deep water.
5. Deregulation of the Airline Industry

The policy of reduced cost and increased competition was due to the deregulation of the airline industry in the United States in the late 1970s and early 1980s. They were forced to jump from the frying pan into the fire. Crumbling down made them fight back, but they were of no use. While other airlines exploited the freedom, Pan Am was trying to hold what was left of their loyalty.
6. Failure to Adapt
Innovative competitors were taking their chance to adapt and be creative when Pan Am was just in denial. They struggled to adapt to changing market dynamics and customer preferences. They were pretty slow on that matter. Updating their services, implementing new technologies, and fleet modernization were not included in their agenda. It was kind of a loophole to overtake the near monopoly of Pan Am.
7. Sale of Assets

The airline was having a tough time and they couldn't handle the financial pressure and business stress. So they started to sell their valuable assets including their prized routes and the iconic Pan Am building in NewYork city. This desperate act made their value go downhill and revenue-generating capabilities to ashes. Delta Airlines saw the opportunity and acquired all the Pan Am's proud routes and shuttle service in a blink of an eye. They were not realizing they were digging their own graves. MetLife was more than happy in acquiring 'The Pan Am Tower' situated in New York. It kind of steals the public's attention because of its unique layout and center position. Johnson Control bid the most for the PAWS(Pan Am World Services).
8. Bankruptcy and Liquidations
After all this Pan Am doesn't had a snowball's chance in hell to be productive. They tried their best to secure their investments and restructure their operations, but they had to file for bankruptcy in 1991. Gradually their assets were seized and auctioned. Guilford Transportation Industries bought the company's name and imagery in 199. They changed the name to 'Pan Am Systems ' and adopted the globular logo.
All the above reasons such as financial challenges, external shocks, and other deregulation issues gradually made the deathbed of Pan American World Airways, putting an end to the era of the promising and prominent airline.
By
Rolwin Biju C
FALL OF GENERAL MOTORS IN INDIA
CafΓ© Coffee Day: Corporate Failure
THE FAILURE OF KINGFISHER AIRLINES
Disclaimer: this blog was written for educational purpose, the resource of the data in this blog was online journals.
Kingfisher Airlines was India's one of the most highly profiled Airlines which was owned by biggest liquor tycoon of India. It was established in the year 2003; which is based in Bangalore. The parent company of kingfisher airlines was united breweries group. the air line started its commercial operations in 2005. the owner of kingfisher airlines (KFA) was Vijay Mallya and Sanjay Aggrawall was the CEO.
It was the first Indian airline to have (IFE) Inflight entertainment system on every seat even on domestic flights. The kingfisher airlines have a 360 degree promotion strategies in place. they reach out to its customers through all media of communication such as T.V, radio, newspaper, magazines etc...
kingfisher airlines achieved success by gaining customer satisfaction through offering grate, luxurious, and comfortable flying experience. according to the data shown in Wikipedia kingfisher airlines have a revenue of 25,982.78 crore in 2012 and a net income of 8,765.9 crore in 2012. until December 2011, KFA was holding 2nd largest share in India's domestic air travel market. after this time period it started to face extremal financial crisis. according to the annual report of KFA 2011-12 ; it shows reasonable doubts over the companies existence. it shows a loss around 690 crore were accumulated by the company. in order to keep the loss making business functioning, Vijay Mallya resorted to continuously borrowing money from banks. by 2012 KFA was declared as a NPA by SBI. At this point it even had failed to pay its employees which led to its pilots leaving it for better opportunities.
one of the important cause of the failure was the improper management; including poor financial planning, lack of focus on core operations. Vijay Mallya focused on luxuriousness rather than economic class. at that time KFA merged with air decan and started Kingfisher red. it was a business strategic plan but it caused confusion in customers mind and it degraded the brand status and company lost it premium value. another scandal on the company kingfisher airlines was it held the service tax of passengers, PF, income tax of employees, but did not submitted to the PF or IT authorities.
after happening of all this events the company was bankrupted and (DGCA) Directorate General of Civil Aviation suspended the flying license of kingfisher airlines and ceased its operations on 20 th October 2012.
The failure of Tata Docomo
Why did TATA Docomo fail?
Tata Docomo was a joint venture between Tata teleservices and a Japanese telecom company called NTT Docomo. Tata Docomo came into existence in 2008 and it has 2G and 3G services in India. The company provided several services for its customers and has received many business awards for its telecom services. But some serious factors affected its performance and led to the failure of Tata Docomo. In this study, the various reasons for the failure of the company are discussed.
Reasons for the failure of Tata Docomo
1.Competition from other telecom market players
Tata Docomo faced intense competition from other telecom providers like Vodafone and Airtel, who had better infrastructure and more attractive services. It was difficult for the company to retain its customers and it failed to attract new customers.
2.Poor financial performance
The company failed to meet its standards and incurred huge losses. The competitors' low price offerings also reduced the margins for Tata Docomo.
3.Issues with partnership
Because of the low market share and revenue, NTT decided to exit from the venture and it significantly affected the business.
4.Lack of technological innovations
The company failed to upgrade itself from 3G to 4G and it also failed to upgrade its network coverage. So the customers switched to other service providers who provided more attractive offers and network coverage. So, the inability to adapt itself to the changing technologies caused customer dissatisfaction.
5.Cancellation of license
Three licenses of Tata teleservices were canceled by the supreme court and the court fined Tata teleservices for benefiting from the 2G telecom spectrum scam.
These are the main reasons for the failure of Tata Docomo.
Now all the Tata Docomo customers are merged with Airtel network, and the company has been taken over by Bharti Airtel.
- ANJU PAULSON
Cracking the Case: The Shocking Failures That Led to Yahoo's Ultimate Demise
"Faliure is only the end if you decide to stop"
Jerry Yang and David Filo Established " Yahoo " in January 1994. As most of you are aware, Yahoo was once a powerful online Titan. How such a large internet company struggled to stay up with rivals in the technological sector and suffered a sharp downturn in the early 2000s is still a mystery. Below are a few crucial elements that contibuted to Yahoo experiencing a corporate failure.
1. The corporation was dealing with a number of internal problems and a frequently shifting top management . which opened the door for lack of concentration and inferior tatics.
2. Yahoo failed to develop and iprove their services since their technologies were outdated and inefficient.
3. Yahoo was unable to recognize global trends like Social networking an other mobile technology.
4. Due to frequent data breaches, customers began to lose faith in Yahoo.
5. When Google an Miscrosoft entered the market, there was intense competition for Yahoo, which forced it to compete for customers and advertisers.
6. Users opted for other customer-friendly interfaces because yahoo's was too much complex and unfriendly.
Verizon Communications purchased Yahoo's primary internet divison in 2016 for a very small fraction of what it was actually worth. this signaled yahoo's collapse and exposed it as a corporate failure.
Thankyou
- Ujwal Unnikrishnan




