Work Culture of Microsoft
NETFLIX’S MARKETING STRATEGY
THREADS APP
Tesla Motors
Tesla's EV Strategy & Challenges
A CASE STUDY ON McDonald's CORPORATION
A Study On Tata Group of Companies
A CASE STUDY ON COCA-COLA COMPANY
The Coca -Cola company, American corporation founded in 1892, is one of the world's famous and largest brands in beverage industry ,which is a global symbol of American tastes. The founder of the company - John Pemberton. With more than 2800 products, available in more than 200 countries, Coca- Cola is the largest beverage manufacturer and distributor in the world and one of the largest corporations in the united states. Headquarters of the company are in Atlanta, Georgia. The world is changing all around Coca- Cola. The companies mission is to refresh the world and make a difference. And their vision is to craft the brands and choice of drinks that people love, it creates a long-term destination for business and their competitive brands like Pepsi, Red bull, Nescafe. There has been a great competition between refreshment drinks in Indian market.
Culture plays an important role in customer behavior, Coca-Cola is mainly associated to the issues related to the brand, reputation and CSR. India is a country where people are keeping towards the culture. Having respect and understanding of another culture and as well as ability to set one's own cultural values. Perhaps the biggest problem faced by multinational organizations is learning how best to market products and treat customers in emerging global markets. It is important to keep good relationship with the government. Ethical issues like water resource exploitation are believed to be hyped by the media and not the general public. The center for science and environment (CSE) , an activist group of engineers, scientists, journalists in India, for unsafe products said to contain pesticide residues found were known to cause diseases such as cancer, birth defects, and severe disruption of the immune system and other health conditions. Because of this CSE and NGO's on Coca- Cola, the brand faced many challenges. Firstly they were the most valuable brand and now their primary problem was trying to rebuilding their image to the public and regaining Indian customers trust. These allegations are not only threatening to Coca- Cola customers, but to the company's reputation as well.
The Plachimada struggle was launched by the Anti Coca- Cola peoples struggle committee on April 2002 with a blockade by over 1300 people, mostly Adivasis, demanding that the coke plant be shut down as it was devastating their source of survival. The company raised political, environmental, ethical, cultural issues in India. The company need to concentrate in many aspects so that they can grab more market share and earn respect from the community members. Company has to adopt alternate branding and promotion strategies to develop it's fan base in India. It is necessary to the company should have a correct view about the management style of particular country. It is not easy for a company to run business smoothly without considering the issues, especially if the company is of foreign origin. The main drawback which is the company is using fresh water in such a large quantity where there is a crisis for fresh drinking water; due to it's waste discharge they have been spoiling the water and soil. Farmers are facing numerous problems with their crops. These problems are indirectly affecting the life of the people staying nearby to the manufacturing plant. The cultural and economic conditions in India is stable and favorable for the company, but the environmental problems are making issues among the public and government. Therefore as suggested, the company should employ an efficient corporate social responsibility team to monitor their operations in the Indian sub- continent and make policies to overcome any such instances and then coca- cola can make a brilliant come back to the market.
AISWARYA K
A CASE STUDY ON FEW INSTANCES OF WORMS IN CADBURY DAIRY MILK
Fading Wings: PAN AM's Quiet Descent

Imagine being the founding member of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), enjoying a near monopoly on international routes, the unofficial national carrier of the United States; that was Pan Am. Pan American World Airways founded in 1927 by two U.S Army Majors was the most famous principal and largest international air carrier. They were the unofficial overseas flag carrier of the United States for the most part of the 20th century. Once their slogan was "Live today, Tomorrow will cost more!". They were at the top of their field as the sky is not their limit. But now a few people know the name Pan Am. Now it's just one of the defunct companies that are being diminished from the minds of the public. Only bits and pieces of this "Conglomerate" exists today. The descent is due to a lot of internal and external factors, the Industry.
1. Financial Troubles

All companies experience tightness in their financials. But in this case, they expanded their fleet at a rate no one would imagine. And that made their pockets a little slim. The problem was time they expanded. Many other airlines came in for their own pound of customers and they were ready to sacrifice a little bit of profit for gaining (in this scenario stealing from Pan Am)customers. The expansion of fleets and routes set back a fortune and that put them in a tight spot making them not able to reduce the price. That only strained their financial resources.
2. Rising Debt
They did accomplish a great expansion in fleet and route, but the question is at what cost? They alone couldn't handle such a large change. So they took some financial help from the available sources. Actually can't blame them, if the other emerging airlines haven't been so generous Pan Am could pull through out of that debt. This large debt took their ability to be financially stable like before.
3. Oil Price Shocks

The infamous Oil Crisis in 1970 was a significant turning point in global energy dynamics, influencing policies, economies, and geopolitics for years to come. This shook Pan Am badly because their planes were craving the costly jet fuel. Blaming OAPEC (Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries) and their response to the political development in the Middle East was making no good. The overly-priced jet fuel made their financials thinner.
4. Terrorist Attacks

There was a terrorist bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 when it was over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988. Already their financials were a mess and their goodwill was getting out of hand. And now this, being able to be like old times was just a normal daydream. For Pan Am the old saying is true; "When it Rains, it Pours". They wanted to fly but they were in deep water.
5. Deregulation of the Airline Industry

The policy of reduced cost and increased competition was due to the deregulation of the airline industry in the United States in the late 1970s and early 1980s. They were forced to jump from the frying pan into the fire. Crumbling down made them fight back, but they were of no use. While other airlines exploited the freedom, Pan Am was trying to hold what was left of their loyalty.
6. Failure to Adapt
Innovative competitors were taking their chance to adapt and be creative when Pan Am was just in denial. They struggled to adapt to changing market dynamics and customer preferences. They were pretty slow on that matter. Updating their services, implementing new technologies, and fleet modernization were not included in their agenda. It was kind of a loophole to overtake the near monopoly of Pan Am.
7. Sale of Assets

The airline was having a tough time and they couldn't handle the financial pressure and business stress. So they started to sell their valuable assets including their prized routes and the iconic Pan Am building in NewYork city. This desperate act made their value go downhill and revenue-generating capabilities to ashes. Delta Airlines saw the opportunity and acquired all the Pan Am's proud routes and shuttle service in a blink of an eye. They were not realizing they were digging their own graves. MetLife was more than happy in acquiring 'The Pan Am Tower' situated in New York. It kind of steals the public's attention because of its unique layout and center position. Johnson Control bid the most for the PAWS(Pan Am World Services).
8. Bankruptcy and Liquidations
After all this Pan Am doesn't had a snowball's chance in hell to be productive. They tried their best to secure their investments and restructure their operations, but they had to file for bankruptcy in 1991. Gradually their assets were seized and auctioned. Guilford Transportation Industries bought the company's name and imagery in 199. They changed the name to 'Pan Am Systems ' and adopted the globular logo.
All the above reasons such as financial challenges, external shocks, and other deregulation issues gradually made the deathbed of Pan American World Airways, putting an end to the era of the promising and prominent airline.
By
Rolwin Biju C
FALL OF GENERAL MOTORS IN INDIA
CafΓ© Coffee Day: Corporate Failure
THE FAILURE OF KINGFISHER AIRLINES
Disclaimer: this blog was written for educational purpose, the resource of the data in this blog was online journals.
Kingfisher Airlines was India's one of the most highly profiled Airlines which was owned by biggest liquor tycoon of India. It was established in the year 2003; which is based in Bangalore. The parent company of kingfisher airlines was united breweries group. the air line started its commercial operations in 2005. the owner of kingfisher airlines (KFA) was Vijay Mallya and Sanjay Aggrawall was the CEO.
It was the first Indian airline to have (IFE) Inflight entertainment system on every seat even on domestic flights. The kingfisher airlines have a 360 degree promotion strategies in place. they reach out to its customers through all media of communication such as T.V, radio, newspaper, magazines etc...
kingfisher airlines achieved success by gaining customer satisfaction through offering grate, luxurious, and comfortable flying experience. according to the data shown in Wikipedia kingfisher airlines have a revenue of 25,982.78 crore in 2012 and a net income of 8,765.9 crore in 2012. until December 2011, KFA was holding 2nd largest share in India's domestic air travel market. after this time period it started to face extremal financial crisis. according to the annual report of KFA 2011-12 ; it shows reasonable doubts over the companies existence. it shows a loss around 690 crore were accumulated by the company. in order to keep the loss making business functioning, Vijay Mallya resorted to continuously borrowing money from banks. by 2012 KFA was declared as a NPA by SBI. At this point it even had failed to pay its employees which led to its pilots leaving it for better opportunities.
one of the important cause of the failure was the improper management; including poor financial planning, lack of focus on core operations. Vijay Mallya focused on luxuriousness rather than economic class. at that time KFA merged with air decan and started Kingfisher red. it was a business strategic plan but it caused confusion in customers mind and it degraded the brand status and company lost it premium value. another scandal on the company kingfisher airlines was it held the service tax of passengers, PF, income tax of employees, but did not submitted to the PF or IT authorities.
after happening of all this events the company was bankrupted and (DGCA) Directorate General of Civil Aviation suspended the flying license of kingfisher airlines and ceased its operations on 20 th October 2012.
The failure of Tata Docomo
Why did TATA Docomo fail?
Tata Docomo was a joint venture between Tata teleservices and a Japanese telecom company called NTT Docomo. Tata Docomo came into existence in 2008 and it has 2G and 3G services in India. The company provided several services for its customers and has received many business awards for its telecom services. But some serious factors affected its performance and led to the failure of Tata Docomo. In this study, the various reasons for the failure of the company are discussed.
Reasons for the failure of Tata Docomo
1.Competition from other telecom market players
Tata Docomo faced intense competition from other telecom providers like Vodafone and Airtel, who had better infrastructure and more attractive services. It was difficult for the company to retain its customers and it failed to attract new customers.
2.Poor financial performance
The company failed to meet its standards and incurred huge losses. The competitors' low price offerings also reduced the margins for Tata Docomo.
3.Issues with partnership
Because of the low market share and revenue, NTT decided to exit from the venture and it significantly affected the business.
4.Lack of technological innovations
The company failed to upgrade itself from 3G to 4G and it also failed to upgrade its network coverage. So the customers switched to other service providers who provided more attractive offers and network coverage. So, the inability to adapt itself to the changing technologies caused customer dissatisfaction.
5.Cancellation of license
Three licenses of Tata teleservices were canceled by the supreme court and the court fined Tata teleservices for benefiting from the 2G telecom spectrum scam.
These are the main reasons for the failure of Tata Docomo.
Now all the Tata Docomo customers are merged with Airtel network, and the company has been taken over by Bharti Airtel.
- ANJU PAULSON
Cracking the Case: The Shocking Failures That Led to Yahoo's Ultimate Demise
"Faliure is only the end if you decide to stop"
Jerry Yang and David Filo Established " Yahoo " in January 1994. As most of you are aware, Yahoo was once a powerful online Titan. How such a large internet company struggled to stay up with rivals in the technological sector and suffered a sharp downturn in the early 2000s is still a mystery. Below are a few crucial elements that contibuted to Yahoo experiencing a corporate failure.
1. The corporation was dealing with a number of internal problems and a frequently shifting top management . which opened the door for lack of concentration and inferior tatics.
2. Yahoo failed to develop and iprove their services since their technologies were outdated and inefficient.
3. Yahoo was unable to recognize global trends like Social networking an other mobile technology.
4. Due to frequent data breaches, customers began to lose faith in Yahoo.
5. When Google an Miscrosoft entered the market, there was intense competition for Yahoo, which forced it to compete for customers and advertisers.
6. Users opted for other customer-friendly interfaces because yahoo's was too much complex and unfriendly.
Verizon Communications purchased Yahoo's primary internet divison in 2016 for a very small fraction of what it was actually worth. this signaled yahoo's collapse and exposed it as a corporate failure.
Thankyou
- Ujwal Unnikrishnan




